Notice and show cause notice replies
Drafted with the reconciliation attached, filed within the window, in ASMT-11, DRC-06 or the relevant form.

GST dispute resolution is the process of answering, contesting and settling a demand raised by the GST department. It starts long before a courtroom. Most disputes begin with a system-generated mismatch or a scrutiny notice, and a large number of them can be closed at that stage with a clean reply and the right reconciliation.
If the officer is not satisfied, the matter moves through adjudication, then a first appeal, then the tribunal, and only after that to the courts. Each step has its own form, its own deadline and its own money to be deposited upfront. Miss one and you can lose a case you would otherwise have won on merits.
At DSRV and Co LLP, we have spent over 30 years handling indirect tax disputes for Indian businesses. Our approach is simple: fix it at the earliest possible stage, because the cost and the disruption multiply the further up you go.

Most demands trace back to a handful of causes. Mismatches between GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and GSTR-2B. Input tax credit claimed on a supplier who did not pay. Classification and tax rate differences on the same product. Place of supply questions on export and intermediary services. Refund claims rejected on technical grounds. E-way bill errors picked up in transit.
Add to that the automated notices. DRC-01B for a liability mismatch and DRC-01C for an ITC mismatch now fire straight from the GSTN matching engine with a short reply window, and an unanswered DRC-01C can block your next GSTR-1 filing altogether. A dispute can now start without any human officer looking at your file first.
Many of these are not really disagreements about the law. They are documentation gaps. That is why the reply stage matters more than most businesses realise. Read our guide on how to reply for a GST notice before you draft anything.
This is where cases are won cheaply through effective compliance strategies. A scrutiny notice in ASMT-10 is answered in ASMT-11. A show cause notice in DRC-01 needs a factual, document-backed reply, not an argument. Since FY 2024-25, a single provision, Section 74A, has replaced the old fraud and non-fraud split at the notice stage, with a uniform time limit for issuing the notice and passing the order. The reduced-penalty payment window is now 60 days instead of 30.
The proper officer hears you and passes an order. If the order was passed without a proper hearing, or the notice was too vague to answer, that itself becomes a strong ground later. High Courts have been consistent on natural justice in GST adjudication, and we build that record from day one.
An appeal under Section 107 is filed in Form APL-01 within three months of the order, extendable by one month for sufficient cause under the GST law. You must pay the admitted tax in full plus 10% of the disputed tax before it is entertained. The authority confirms, modifies or reverses the order in APL-04.
For eight years there was no working tribunal, so businesses were pushed into writ petitions. That gap has closed. The GST Appellate Tribunal is now operational, with a Principal Bench in New Delhi and State Benches sitting across the country, and every appeal is filed electronically in Form APL-05 on the GSTAT e-filing portal.
This is the last forum that looks at facts. High Courts will only hear questions of law, so the factual record you build here is the one you are stuck with.
Appeals under Sections 117 and 118 are limited to questions of law. A writ petition under Article 226 remains available earlier where there is a jurisdictional defect, a breach of natural justice, or a coercive recovery action such as a bank account attachment.
Where a transaction is genuinely unclear, an advance ruling settles the position before you file, instead of arguing about it three years later. Underused, and often the cheapest form of dispute resolution there is.

Appeals in GST are not free, and the cash outflow often decides whether a business fights or folds.
At the first appeal stage you pay the admitted liability in full plus 10% of the disputed tax. At the tribunal stage you pay a further 10% of the disputed tax that survives the first appeal order, subject to a statutory cap, which brings the cumulative deposit on disputed tax to roughly 20%. For penalty-only orders, where no tax is demanded, a separate 10% of the disputed penalty applies. Pre-deposit on penalty, interest, and fee has to come from the electronic cash ledger, not from accumulated input tax credit, so it is a real cash hit under the GST law.
The payoff is worth knowing. Once the pre-deposit is correctly paid at the tribunal stage, recovery of the balance demand is stayed by operation of law. No separate stay application is needed. That means no bank attachment and no garnishee notice on your customers while the appeal is pending. If you win, the deposit comes back with statutory interest.
One timing point: the one-time window for filing the huge backlog of legacy appeals before the tribunal was extended to 31 July 2026 and has now closed. Orders communicated after that fall under the normal three-month limitation, with condonation possible for up to three further months and no relief beyond six months. If you have an old adverse order sitting in a drawer, get it reviewed now rather than assuming the option is still open.
Drafted with the reconciliation attached, filed within the window, in ASMT-11, DRC-06 or the relevant form.
GSTR-1, 3B, 2B, and books matched before the tax authorities do it for you.
Line-by-line rebuttal of arithmetic and classification errors. See our note on handling inflated GST tax demands.
Eligibility, supplier default, blocked credit and Rule 86A restrictions.
Including the procedure to file clarification during GST registration.
APL-01 and APL-05 filings, pre-deposit computation, grounds of appeal, and complete paper books for taxpayer compliance.
Urgent action where accounts are frozen or a garnishee notice has gone to your customers.
Representation when you are called for questioning under Section 70.
Zero-rated supplies, LUT, place of supply, and intermediary classification are crucial for taxpayer compliance.
Certainty on a position before the transaction, not after.
Before officers, appellate authorities, and the tribunal, supported by our compliance with the GST law. GST litigation services and tax litigation services teams.

Three decades in indirect tax means we have usually seen your notice before. We tell you honestly whether a case is worth fighting or worth settling, because a weak appeal costs you the pre-deposit, the fees and two years of management attention for nothing.
We also work on prevention. Once a dispute is closed, we fix the process that caused it, so the same demand does not arrive again next year. As a long-standing GST consultant in Gurgaon and part of our wider dispute resolution mechanism. taxation services practice, we handle everything from a single mismatch notice to a multi-year tribunal matter.
It depends on the notice. Scrutiny notices usually allow 30 days, registration-related notices 7 days, and automated DRC-01C intimations as little as 7 days. Always work from the date printed on the notice.
Often, yes, especially when utilizing the dispute resolution mechanism. A well-supported reply at the notice or show cause stage closes a large share of disputes. Paying the tax with reduced penalty inside the 60-day window is also a valid commercial exit.
The admitted amount in full, plus 10% of the disputed tax at the first appeal stage and a further 10% at the tribunal stage, subject to caps. Penalty-only appeals carry a 10% deposit on the penalty.
No. Once the required pre-deposit is paid at the tribunal stage, recovery of the balance is stayed by law until the appeal is adjudicated.
Only in limited situations, such as a jurisdictional defect, a denial of hearing, or coercive recovery under the GST law. Otherwise the appellate route has to be exhausted first.
The appellate authority can condone a delay of up to one month, and the tribunal up to three months, on sufficient cause. Beyond that the bar is absolute, and only a writ petition remains.
Yes. Filings and hearings are largely digital now, and tribunal hearings run in hybrid mode, so we act for clients across India.
